[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49797.192.168.102.6.1216318897.squirrel@intranet>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:21:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <daniel@...ac.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, oleg@...sign.ru,
xemul@...nvz.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check
for task_child_reaper
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@...ac.com> writes:
>
>> p->pid == 1 is insufficient when there are multiple pid namespaces.
>> Instead, check whether the task is in the current task's
>> child reaper's thread group.
>
> We should just drop the check for init as it is redundant.
I'm not sure what you mean? Without protecting init here, kill -s 9 -- -1
will kill it (i.e. the init in the pid namespace). E.g.:
# vspace --new --pid --mount -- bash
# bash -c 'kill -s 9 -- -1'
will kill off all those processes, and dispose of the pid namespace.
> Eric
--
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists