[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080717221652.GF18326@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:16:52 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
gorcunov@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
Another point that came into my mind:
How many scripts and programs out there parse the kernel version number,
know about the 2.6 prefix, and might need an update if it changes?
Not a big deal if a change would indicate a big change like with the old
development model - but IMHO not worth it if there's no compelling
reason why we have to change the numbering at all.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists