[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30807180124j3623675fwaeedcaf23e4b0b05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:24:59 +0900
From: "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: "Ben Dooks" <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de, lethal@...ux-sh.org, i2c@...sensors.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org> wrote:
> You are changing a simple test to a mask and compare, is anyone going
> to produce resources with an IORESOURCE_MEM and an IORESOURCE_IO
> together?
Actually, I'd like to replace the one-bit-per-type strategy with a
N-bit counter. But that is not very compatible with the case you are
pointing out. I'm not sure if that's a combination we really want to
support though. Both IRQ and DMA doesn't make much sense to me. =)
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists