[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216382220.16208.26.camel@elijah.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:57:00 +0200
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] tracehook: add linux/tracehook.h
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:34 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:48:18PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > The new linux/ptrace.h inlines are used by the following patches in the
> > > new tracehook_*() inlines. Using these helpers for the ptrace event
> > > stops makes it simple to change or disable the old ptrace implementation
> > > of these stops conditionally later.
> >
> > Call them "utrace_*" from the start?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> > Pointless 1:1 wrapper unless you're going to #ifdef ->ptrace later.
>
> Even then I don't think it's a good idea. This one should only be
> touched in very very few places
So, do you suggest putting those #ifdef's in the middle of the function
which uses it? Anyway, this patch should probably be posted later, i.e.
when the other implementation is actually introduced.
My $0.02.
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists