[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0807180458i2749f5d0jc5c07f691931954e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:58:15 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Josef Bacik" <jbacik@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andreas Dilger" <adilger@....com>,
"Josef Bacik" <josef@...icpanda.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...urebad.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 on latest -git: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000c
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com> wrote:
>> You can see the full log at
>> http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/log-1216380709.txt which shows that
>> it already survived a lot of failures, so I'm guessing your patch was
>> correct and we just hit a different case. What do you think?
>>
>
> Yeah you are right, its like a shitty game of wack-a-mole. Heres another patch,
> same thing as last time, pull the other one out put this one on. Thanks,
It seems to hold up -- no stacktraces, but lots of IO failures.
I would leave it in testing for a bit more, but I've got to run; I'll
give it another go when I get home.
You may see the log so far: http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/log-1216382128.txt
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists