linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:54:04 -0700
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>> in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less 
>>> without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
>>>
>>> 	Ingo
>> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4.  The earlier problems came 
>> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went 
>> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)
> 
> well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one 
> resolved?
> 
> 	Ingo

I will test with gcc-4.2.3 as soon as I'm able, and will let you know.
(There have been changes from when you hit the panic.)

I will resubmit against tip/master.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/