| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48811F0C.6090103@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:54:04 -0700 From: Mike Travis <travis@....com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> Subject: Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> ... >>> in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less >>> without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet. >>> >>> Ingo >> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4. The earlier problems came >> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went >> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.) > > well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one > resolved? > > Ingo I will test with gcc-4.2.3 as soon as I'm able, and will let you know. (There have been changes from when you hit the panic.) I will resubmit against tip/master. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists