linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080718044420.GB9795@secretlab.ca>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:44:20 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:35:12PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> This brings us back to the issue we also have with DCR controlled
> devices.  Possibly we should have two ways of representing these
> connections: for "pure" GPIO-only or DCR-only devices, they appear
> under the relevant controller with the addresses encoded with 'reg'.
> For devices on other busses which also have a few GPIO lines / DCR
> registers, they would appear on the other bus with 'gpios' or
> 'dcr-reg' properties (or some new, generalized 'other-bus-reg'
> property).

On the other hand; it's just LEDs.  I think a single scheme is enough.

:-)

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/