linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080718050930.GD9795@secretlab.ca>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:09:30 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc:	Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:42:01AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
<lots of legitimate frustration snipped>
> So..
> 
> Trent, I encourage you to collect your patch snippets into complete patch,
> and post it so it could slip into 2.6.27 (the bad thing is that your
> approach involves changes to the existing drivers, not just adding new
> driver that could slip even into -rc9).
> 
> That is, I have a bunch of patches in my stg queue on which I can work
> with more fun, so I'm somewhat glad that somebody will take care of the
> notorious OF GPIO LEDs. ;-)

Okay.  Thank you for all your work; it is *much* appreciated.  I'm sorry
that these things didn't come up earlier and I feel your pain.  :-)

Trent, I'd be happy to help and do what I can to expedite getting of
gpio-leds support merged in the .27 window.

> > I like the first better.  It follows the example from the docs about how
> > devices with multiple gpios should work too.
> 
> IMO, each LED is a device. So, I would rather define compatible = <> for
> each led.

If we choose that all gpio-leds will have a common parent, then I'd
still argue for the compatible property to be on the parent node because
all the children are homogeneous.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/