[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807210958570.24625@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:59:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: mfasheh@...e.com, joel.becker@...cle.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] fs/ocfs2/file.c: Release mutex in error handling code
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
The mutex is released on a successful return, so it would seem that it
should be released on an error return as well.
The semantic patch finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression l;
@@
mutex_lock(l);
... when != mutex_unlock(l)
when any
when strict
(
if (...) { ... when != mutex_unlock(l)
+ mutex_unlock(l);
return ...;
}
|
mutex_unlock(l);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
diff -u -p a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -1766,8 +1766,8 @@ out_inode_unlock:
out_rw_unlock:
ocfs2_rw_unlock(inode, 1);
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
out:
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists