linux-kernel - Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1216670533.7585.181.camel@cunning>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:02:13 -0400
From:	Ben Collins <bcollins@...ssdisk.com>
To:	"Joshua C." <joshuacov@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option

On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2008/7/21 Ben Collins <ben.collins@...onical.com>:
> >
> > Could you rebase it on latest git (lots of fuzz)? Other than that, it
> > looks good to me. We've been carrying this patch forever, so would be
> > nice to have it applied upstream finally.
> >
> >
> 
> I tried the current patch (acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.9a-2.6.25.patch) with
> fedora kernel-2.6.27-0.161.rc0.git6.fc10 which is git6 and it compiled
> without any problems. I didn't modify anything on the patch. so it
> should be "production" ready in its current state, shouldn't it? Maybe
> this time it can make its way upstream.

I didn't have any problems with it either, but I would hate for some
fuzz to keep it from getting accepted :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/