[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080723014910.7351c495.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:49:10 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: fix struct uart_info change fallout
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:44:36 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > What is your problem with the linux-next tree. The problem was
> > discovered and reported when I first merged the ttydev tree into
> > linux-next on July 1. The fixes were in linux-next on July 2.
>
> Yes .. and ? The clashes kept happening despite that when I was doing the
> merges (and going on holiday for a week and trying to sort it out with
> limited time and internet access)
>
> Sorry I don't follow your line of discussion at all here ?
I interpreted your "So much for the linux-next tree" as saying "well,
that has been no help". I am sorry if I got that wrong.
But my point above is that you had a fix for the current breakage in
Linus' tree a couple of weeks before you sent the patches to Linus that
broke the powerpc build (i.e. linux-next did its job) and yet you didn't
combine the fix with the original patch or send the fix with the original
patch. So we end up with a powerpc tree that won't build in the middle
of the merge window while more powerpc patches are trying to be
tested ... I understand that this could easily happen because of
forgetfulness, tiredness or accident.
More care was needed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists