[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722165929.717e38d4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:59:29 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: fix struct uart_info change fallout
> I interpreted your "So much for the linux-next tree" as saying "well,
> that has been no help". I am sorry if I got that wrong.
True it didn't help in the merge that much this time. I don't think that
is a problem with the linux-next tree but one of the lack of tty
maintainer and tty tree letting the confusion occur in the first place -
plus a large quantity of first time around ineptness on my part.
> But my point above is that you had a fix for the current breakage in
> Linus' tree a couple of weeks before you sent the patches to Linus that
> broke the powerpc build (i.e. linux-next did its job) and yet you didn't
> combine the fix with the original patch or send the fix with the original
> patch. So we end up with a powerpc tree that won't build in the middle
> of the merge window while more powerpc patches are trying to be
> tested ... I understand that this could easily happen because of
> forgetfulness, tiredness or accident.
I really expected to get the rest merged within an hour or two, but then
it broke, then I was travelling and each time I got wireless access to
resync the tree and work on it - it broke again and again and again.
Next time I will bump the patch up the pile and get it out earlier when
that occurs.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists