linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <488566EA.5040805@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:49:46 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest.

Rusty Russell wrote:
> Change a15af1c9ea2750a9ff01e51615c45950bad8221b 'x86/paravirt: add
> pte_flags to just get pte flags' removed lguest's private pte_flags()
> in favor of a generic one.
>
> Unfortunately, the generic one doesn't filter out the non-flags bits:
> this results in lguest creating corrupt shadow page tables and blowing
> up host memory.
>
> Since noone is supposed to use the pfn part of pte_flags(), it seems
> safest to always do the filtering.
>   

Thinking about this, I wonder if it needs to be a pv_op at all.  
Generality says "yes", but there are no users which set it to anything 
other than native_pte_flags.  The point of it is to return the flags 
as-is, without needing more complex stuff (like Xen's mfn to pfn 
conversion).

In most cases, the surrounding code will be applying its own mask 
anyway, so making it a simple inline will allow all the masks to get 
folded together.

If a user which wants to do something other than return the bare flags, 
it would be easy enough to put the pv_op back.

> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>
> diff -r ee1a6adad3d2 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c	Mon Jul 21 12:49:25 2008 +1000
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c	Tue Jul 22 14:09:33 2008 +1000
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops pv_mmu_ops = {
>  #endif /* PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3 */
>  
>  	.pte_val = native_pte_val,
> -	.pte_flags = native_pte_val,
> +	.pte_flags = native_pte_flags,
>  	.pgd_val = native_pgd_val,
>  
>  	.make_pte = native_make_pte,
> diff -r ee1a6adad3d2 include/asm-x86/page.h
> --- a/include/asm-x86/page.h	Mon Jul 21 12:49:25 2008 +1000
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/page.h	Tue Jul 22 14:09:33 2008 +1000
> @@ -144,6 +144,18 @@ static inline pteval_t native_pte_val(pt
>  	return pte.pte;
>  }
>  
> +/* This belongs in pgtable.h, but our includes are too much of a mess. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PAE)
> +#define PTE_FLAGS	_AC(0x8000000000000FFF, ULL)
> +#else
> +#define PTE_FLAGS	0x00000FFF
> +#endif
>   
We already have this, it's called PTE_MASK.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/