linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200807221452.41586.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:52:41 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest.

On Tuesday 22 July 2008 14:38:00 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:31:58 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> 
wrote:
> > +/* This belongs in pgtable.h, but our includes are too much of a mess.
> > */ +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PAE)
> > +#define PTE_FLAGS	_AC(0x8000000000000FFF, ULL)
>
> Just a small point:  You don't actually need the _AC() because this is
> already in a #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ section of the file.  But better safe
> than sorry, I guess.  :-)

Ah, yes, I had them in pgtable.h before I gave up.  I'll leave it in: if 
someone wants them in asm they can now safely move it.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/