linux-kernel - RE: [linux-pm] [RFC-PATCH] Improve Menu Governor Prediction of interrupted C states.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE8967162035C046A40@dlee02.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:59:55 -0500
From:	"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>
To:	"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>,
	Linux Power Management List <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] [RFC-PATCH] Improve Menu Governor Prediction of
 interrupted C states.

Hi Wei,

I'll give it a try and make some measurements.  It will probable be a week before I can give any feed back.  Its good to see others are looking at this.

Thanks,
Richard W.

> I also found current cpuidle Menu governor should have some problems
> while predicting next non-expected break-event after some expected
> break-events. The measured_us/elapsed_us/predicted_us will become
> larger
> and larger once (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ >= data->expected_us -
> target->exit_latency). The major point is that it should be
> last_residency, not measured_us, that need to be used to do comparing
> and distinguish between expected & non-expected events.
>
> Below is my draft patch (not tested) for this. It is simple and should
> also be effective for high interrupt rates case.
>
> Jimmy
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@...el.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> index 78d77c5..dea5250 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> @@ -80,18 +80,19 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device
> *dev)
>         if (!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID))
>                 measured_us = USEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
>
> +       /* if wrapping, set to max uint (-1) */
> +       measured_us = (data->elapsed_us < measured_us) ? measured_us :
> -1;
> +
>         /* Predict time remaining until next break event */
> -       if (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ < data->expected_us -
> target->exit_latency) {
> -               data->predicted_us = max(measured_us,
> data->last_measured_us);
> +       data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
> +
> +       /* Distinguish between expected & non-expected events */
> +       if (cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev) + BREAK_FUZZ
> +               < data->expected_us - target->exit_latency) {
>                 data->last_measured_us = measured_us;
>                 data->elapsed_us = 0;
> -       } else {
> -               if (data->elapsed_us < data->elapsed_us + measured_us)
> -                       data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
> -               else
> -                       data->elapsed_us = -1;
> -               data->predicted_us = max(measured_us,
> data->last_measured_us);
> -       }
> +       } else
> +               data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
>  }
>
>  /**
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:02 AM, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any comments on the following?
> >
> > I'm finding with high interrupt rates for some USB devices the menu
> governor
> > guesses wrong enough that throughput drops.
> >
> > With the below tweak tests with fixed data sizes which were taking
> 12s
> to
> > complete drop back to 9s.  Also my standby idle doesn't change
> before
> and
> > after activity with our with out the patch.
> >
> > What it does is simply timestamp incoming irqs, then in the menu
> governor
> > will use current & last irq time delta to refine its guess as to how
> long
> > sleep will happen.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Richard W.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/