[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE89671620361F4E439@dlee02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:24:44 -0500
From: "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>
To: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>,
Linux Power Management List <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] [RFC-PATCH] Improve Menu Governor Prediction of
interrupted C states.
Hi,
> I also found current cpuidle Menu governor should have some problems
> while predicting next non-expected break-event after some expected
> break-events. The measured_us/elapsed_us/predicted_us will become
> larger
> and larger once (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ >= data->expected_us -
> target->exit_latency). The major point is that it should be
> last_residency, not measured_us, that need to be used to do comparing
> and distinguish between expected & non-expected events.
>
> Below is my draft patch (not tested) for this. It is simple and should
> also be effective for high interrupt rates case.
This does seem to give better guesses. However, first tests are not showing as well as the irq time stamp version I posted.
I'll need to grab some hardware trace to see what is going on.
Thanks,
Richard W.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists