[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <094BCE01AFBE9646AF220B0B3F367AAB035B08D0@pdsmsx413.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:51:14 +0800
From: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>
To: "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
"Linux Power Management List" <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] [RFC-PATCH] Improve Menu Governor Prediction of interrupted C states.
> Hi,
>
>> I also found current cpuidle Menu governor should have some problems
>> while predicting next non-expected break-event after some expected
>> break-events. The measured_us/elapsed_us/predicted_us will become
larger
>> and larger once (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ >= data->expected_us -
>> target->exit_latency). The major point is that it should be
>> last_residency, not measured_us, that need to be used to do comparing
>> and distinguish between expected & non-expected events.
>>
>> Below is my draft patch (not tested) for this. It is simple and
should
>> also be effective for high interrupt rates case.
>
> This does seem to give better guesses. However, first tests are not
showing
> as well as the irq time stamp version I posted.
>
> I'll need to grab some hardware trace to see what is going on.
Thanks for the trial. My original patch has already been merged into
another patch "[patch 2/3] cpuidle: Menu governor fix wrong usage of
measured_us" sent out by Venkatesh. The new patch should be more intact.
Jimmy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists