[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4888691D.5090307@ladisch.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:35:57 +0200
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bob.picco@...com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.26] /dev/hpet - fixes and cleanup
David Brownell wrote:
> I didn't find any software using /dev/hpet, except for
> the example in Documentation/hpet.txt ... presumably I
> was looking in the wrong place. I'd surely have retched
> at anything mmapping hardware registers though. ;)
http://subversion.jackaudio.org/jack/trunk/jack/config/os/gnu-linux/time.c
> > This seems to be the only part of the userspace interface that is
> > used in practice. Because of the availability of POSIX timers, it might
> > make sense to deprecate the HPET ioctl interface.
>
> I'll leave that part up to someone else. If POSIX timers
> are a sufficient userspace interface, great ... then that
> mmap son't really be needed either!
The idea is to be able to get a high-precision timer value without doing
a syscall. (Whether the syscall overhead actually matters in a specific
application is another question.)
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists