[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807251255.35675.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:55:35 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bob.picco@...com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.26] /dev/hpet - fixes and cleanup
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > > This seems to be the only part of the userspace interface that is
> > > used in practice. Because of the availability of POSIX timers, it might
> > > make sense to deprecate the HPET ioctl interface.
> >
> > I'll leave that part up to someone else. If POSIX timers
> > are a sufficient userspace interface, great ... then that
> > mmap son't really be needed either!
>
> The idea is to be able to get a high-precision timer value without doing
> a syscall. (Whether the syscall overhead actually matters in a specific
> application is another question.)
On x86_64 the vsyscall stuff should kick in for gettimeofday()
when HPET is in use, eliminating the need for /dev/hpet mmapping.
I don't really know vsyscalls ... but if that could be done on
i386 systems, the last argument for /dev/hpet would seem gone...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists