[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650807231839g399f57a8ied548d81eefdbebd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:39:37 -0500
From: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
To: "Harvey Harrison" <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
"Shirish Pargaonkar" <shirishpargaonkar@...il.com>
Cc: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cifs: suggestions for a few more sparse warnings
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Harvey Harrison
<harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> Here's a patch for some of the other warnings, but the cifsacl.c bit
> needs a comment I think.
>
> Harvey
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> index 34902cf..70f0ef5 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,7 @@ static void copy_sec_desc(const struct cifs_ntsd *pntsd,
> for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
> ngroup_sid_ptr->authority[i] = group_sid_ptr->authority[i];
> for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
> - ngroup_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i] =
> - cpu_to_le32(group_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i]);
> + cpu_to_le32s(&group_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i]);
>
> return;
> }
No - the cifsacl one looks like just a bug - there should not be an
endian conversion here.
Shirish,
Would you verify?
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists