[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a4634330807240643j6eb3314am343efe6c37992b50@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:43:11 -0500
From: "Shirish Pargaonkar" <shirishpargaonkar@...il.com>
To: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: "Harvey Harrison" <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cifs: suggestions for a few more sparse warnings
Steve,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Harvey Harrison
> <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
>> Here's a patch for some of the other warnings, but the cifsacl.c bit
>> needs a comment I think.
>>
>> Harvey
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> index 34902cf..70f0ef5 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
>> @@ -169,8 +169,7 @@ static void copy_sec_desc(const struct cifs_ntsd *pntsd,
>> for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
>> ngroup_sid_ptr->authority[i] = group_sid_ptr->authority[i];
>> for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
>> - ngroup_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i] =
>> - cpu_to_le32(group_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i]);
>> + cpu_to_le32s(&group_sid_ptr->sub_auth[i]);
>>
>> return;
>> }
>
> No - the cifsacl one looks like just a bug - there should not be an
> endian conversion here.
>
I think you are right, there should not be any conversion since the
sub authorities would be in little endin format when we did get_cifs_acl
prior to this copy.
> Shirish,
> Would you verify?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists