[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488886C8.3020904@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:42:32 +0200
From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@...itsu-siemens.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wichert, Gerhard" <Gerhard.Wichert@...itsu-siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 (64): make calibrate_APIC_clock() SMI-safe
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The other thing we may want to consider is doing multiple runs of the
> calibration loop. I suspect we'd get a more accurate result running,
> say, 9 loops of the 1/9 the current duration and looking either for the
> best result or the median (NOT the mean.)
>
> -hpa
We considered that. However I think if you know what result to expect
(here: TICK_COUNT + a few cycles) it is both easier and safer to compare
against the expected value than to do statistics. SMI protection is all
about outliers (thus, the median is a good suggestion but I'd say it
would be over-enigineered).
Martin
PS: I am sorry for the stupid, misleading typo (SMi -> smp) in the mail
subject.
--
Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
FSC IP ESP DEV 6
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn
Germany
Tel: ++49 5251 8 15113
Fax: ++49 5251 8 20209
Email: mailto:martin.wilck@...itsu-siemens.com
Internet: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com
Company Details: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists