[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216911181.7257.340.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:53:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] nfs: remove mempools
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 00:46 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2008 00:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > With the introduction of the shared dirty page accounting in .19, NFS
> > should not be able to surpise the VM with all dirty pages. Thus it should
> > always be able to free some memory. Hence no more need for mempools.
>
> It seems like a very backward step to me to go from a hard guarantee
> to some heuristic that could break for someone in some particular
> setup.
>
> Filling with dirty pages isn't the only way to exaust free reclaimable
> memory remember, it can also happen maybe due to mlock or kernel
> allocations.
>
> Is there pressing reason to remove them?
There was some funny interaction between mempools and PF_MEMALLOC as
used to write out swap pages iirc.
Specifially, the mempool would strip it and not provide memory even
though we needed it.
I've never hit a deadlock due to this patch in my testing, although
admittedly there might be a hole in my testing.
I can either 'fix' mempools, or replace it with the reserve framework
introduced earlier in this patch-set.
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/read.c | 15 +++------------
> > fs/nfs/write.c | 27 +++++----------------------
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfs/read.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfs/read.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/fs/nfs/read.c
> > @@ -33,13 +33,10 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_rea
> > static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_read_full_ops;
> >
> > static struct kmem_cache *nfs_rdata_cachep;
> > -static mempool_t *nfs_rdata_mempool;
> > -
> > -#define MIN_POOL_READ (32)
> >
> > struct nfs_read_data *nfs_readdata_alloc(unsigned int pagecount)
> > {
> > - struct nfs_read_data *p = mempool_alloc(nfs_rdata_mempool, GFP_NOFS);
> > + struct nfs_read_data *p = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs_rdata_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
> >
> > if (p) {
> > memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> > @@ -50,7 +47,7 @@ struct nfs_read_data *nfs_readdata_alloc
> > else {
> > p->pagevec = kcalloc(pagecount, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_NOFS);
> > if (!p->pagevec) {
> > - mempool_free(p, nfs_rdata_mempool);
> > + kmem_cache_free(nfs_rdata_cachep, p);
> > p = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -62,7 +59,7 @@ static void nfs_readdata_free(struct nfs
> > {
> > if (p && (p->pagevec != &p->page_array[0]))
> > kfree(p->pagevec);
> > - mempool_free(p, nfs_rdata_mempool);
> > + kmem_cache_free(nfs_rdata_cachep, p);
> > }
> >
> > void nfs_readdata_release(void *data)
> > @@ -614,16 +611,10 @@ int __init nfs_init_readpagecache(void)
> > if (nfs_rdata_cachep == NULL)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - nfs_rdata_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_READ,
> > - nfs_rdata_cachep);
> > - if (nfs_rdata_mempool == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > void nfs_destroy_readpagecache(void)
> > {
> > - mempool_destroy(nfs_rdata_mempool);
> > kmem_cache_destroy(nfs_rdata_cachep);
> > }
> > Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfs/write.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfs/write.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/fs/nfs/write.c
> > @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@
> >
> > #define NFSDBG_FACILITY NFSDBG_PAGECACHE
> >
> > -#define MIN_POOL_WRITE (32)
> > -#define MIN_POOL_COMMIT (4)
> > -
> > /*
> > * Local function declarations
> > */
> > @@ -45,12 +42,10 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_wri
> > static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_commit_ops;
> >
> > static struct kmem_cache *nfs_wdata_cachep;
> > -static mempool_t *nfs_wdata_mempool;
> > -static mempool_t *nfs_commit_mempool;
> >
> > struct nfs_write_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void)
> > {
> > - struct nfs_write_data *p = mempool_alloc(nfs_commit_mempool, GFP_NOFS);
> > + struct nfs_write_data *p = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs_wdata_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
> >
> > if (p) {
> > memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> > @@ -63,12 +58,12 @@ void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_write_da
> > {
> > if (p && (p->pagevec != &p->page_array[0]))
> > kfree(p->pagevec);
> > - mempool_free(p, nfs_commit_mempool);
> > + kmem_cache_free(nfs_wdata_cachep, p);
> > }
> >
> > struct nfs_write_data *nfs_writedata_alloc(unsigned int pagecount)
> > {
> > - struct nfs_write_data *p = mempool_alloc(nfs_wdata_mempool, GFP_NOFS);
> > + struct nfs_write_data *p = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs_wdata_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
> >
> > if (p) {
> > memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> > @@ -79,7 +74,7 @@ struct nfs_write_data *nfs_writedata_all
> > else {
> > p->pagevec = kcalloc(pagecount, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_NOFS);
> > if (!p->pagevec) {
> > - mempool_free(p, nfs_wdata_mempool);
> > + kmem_cache_free(nfs_wdata_cachep, p);
> > p = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -91,7 +86,7 @@ static void nfs_writedata_free(struct nf
> > {
> > if (p && (p->pagevec != &p->page_array[0]))
> > kfree(p->pagevec);
> > - mempool_free(p, nfs_wdata_mempool);
> > + kmem_cache_free(nfs_wdata_cachep, p);
> > }
> >
> > void nfs_writedata_release(void *data)
> > @@ -1552,16 +1547,6 @@ int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
> > if (nfs_wdata_cachep == NULL)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - nfs_wdata_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_WRITE,
> > - nfs_wdata_cachep);
> > - if (nfs_wdata_mempool == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - nfs_commit_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_COMMIT,
> > - nfs_wdata_cachep);
> > - if (nfs_commit_mempool == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > /*
> > * NFS congestion size, scale with available memory.
> > *
> > @@ -1587,8 +1572,6 @@ int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
> >
> > void nfs_destroy_writepagecache(void)
> > {
> > - mempool_destroy(nfs_commit_mempool);
> > - mempool_destroy(nfs_wdata_mempool);
> > kmem_cache_destroy(nfs_wdata_cachep);
> > }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists