[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080724150543.GA10549@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:05:43 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Jake Edge <jake@....net>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, stable@...nel.org,
Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 44/47] pxamci: fix byte aligned DMA transfers
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:33:34PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> Both should be applied together. Although it is unlikely that with the
> broken patch MMC accesses will accidentally clear the DALGN bits of
> other running (unaligned) DMA chains (I'm not aware of any drivers
> using unaligned DMA), the PXA27x developer manual says that this "must
> not" be done. If it would result in memory corruption or lockups, I
> don't know.
Ok, I'll add them both to the .26 queue as well.
thanks for the information,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists