[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4888CA2A.1060509@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:30:02 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen-netfront: call netif_start_queue() on xennet_open()
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> xen-netfront was waking the queue before calling netif_start_queue(),
>> triggering the BUG_ON() on __netif_schedule().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
>>
> Ok,
> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>
> but Ingo, do you want to pick this up? You're gathering a collection of
> these patches anyway, or should we kick it over to Dave/Jeff?
>
> J
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> index 902bbe7..c749bdb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int xennet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> }
>> spin_unlock_bh(&np->rx_lock);
>>
>> - xennet_maybe_wake_tx(dev);
>> + netif_start_queue(dev);
This is clearly a net driver change, it should go this way...
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists