[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4889FA03.6010708@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:06:27 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce lower_32_bits() macro
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> The file kernel.h contains the upper_32_bits macro. This patch adds the other
> part, the lower_32_bits macro. Its first use will be in the driver for AMD
> IOMMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index f9cd7a5..6fd2977 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
> */
> #define upper_32_bits(n) ((u32)(((n) >> 16) >> 16))
>
> +/**
> + * lower_32_bits - return bits 0-31 of a number
> + * @n: the number we're accessing
> + */
> +#define lower_32_bits(n) ((n) & 0xffffffffULL)
> +
NAK. These are assymmetric with regards to type, which is the *last*
thing we want.
The symmetric definition would be ((u32)(n)), but that's already
idiomatic use, so why not use it as-is?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists