[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4889FA96.1000701@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:08:54 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Mike Travis wrote:
> FYI, I think it was a combination of errors that was causing my problems.
> In any case, I've successfully compiled and booted Ingo's pesky config
> config-Tue_Jul__1_16_48_45_CEST_2008.bad with gcc's 4.2.0, 4.2.3 and 4.2.4
> on both Intel and AMD boxes. (As well as a variety of other configs.)
>
Good. What compilers have you tested? Will it work over the complete
supported range?
> I think Hugh's change adding "text" to the BUILD_IRQ macro might also have
> helped, since interrupts seemed to have always been involved in the panics.
> That might explain the variable-ness of the gcc version's.
Yes, indeed. That was a nasty one, and will be very sensitive to the
exact order gcc decided to emit things.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists