[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488A0375.4050605@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:46:45 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Mike Travis wrote:
>> FYI, I think it was a combination of errors that was causing my problems.
>> In any case, I've successfully compiled and booted Ingo's pesky config
>> config-Tue_Jul__1_16_48_45_CEST_2008.bad with gcc's 4.2.0, 4.2.3 and
>> 4.2.4
>> on both Intel and AMD boxes. (As well as a variety of other configs.)
>>
>
> Good. What compilers have you tested? Will it work over the complete
> supported range?
The oldest gcc I have available is 3.4.3 (and I just tried that one and
it worked.) So that one and the ones listed above I've verified using
Ingo's test config. (All other testing I'm using 4.2.3.)
>
>> I think Hugh's change adding "text" to the BUILD_IRQ macro might also
>> have
>> helped, since interrupts seemed to have always been involved in the
>> panics.
>> That might explain the variable-ness of the gcc version's.
>
> Yes, indeed. That was a nasty one, and will be very sensitive to the
> exact order gcc decided to emit things.
>
> J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists