[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4889F5FA.1050908@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:49:14 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Did the suspected linker bug issue ever get resolved?
>
> I don't believe so. I think Mike is getting very early crashes
> depending on some combination of gcc, linker and kernel config. Or
> something.
>
> This fragility makes me very nervous. It seems hard enough to get this
> stuff working with current tools; making it work over the whole range of
> supported tools looks like its going to be hard.
>
> J
FYI, I think it was a combination of errors that was causing my problems.
In any case, I've successfully compiled and booted Ingo's pesky config
config-Tue_Jul__1_16_48_45_CEST_2008.bad with gcc's 4.2.0, 4.2.3 and 4.2.4
on both Intel and AMD boxes. (As well as a variety of other configs.)
I think Hugh's change adding "text" to the BUILD_IRQ macro might also have
helped, since interrupts seemed to have always been involved in the panics.
That might explain the variable-ness of the gcc version's.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists