[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b15cc94f988df8d269ad40fafcd911cb@bga.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:59:06 -0500
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] scripts/package: add powerpc images to tarball
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Milton,
>
>> Yes. How about all dtbImage, zImage, cuboot, treeboot, etc
>> that are newer than vmlinux?
>
> The existing arch code doesn't do any checks for timestamps, perhaps
> this would be better implemented as an arch-independent change?
The problem is some people might want to add intermediate files that are
younger than vmlinux (eg .config). We know our boot-image should be
newer. But I don't know how one would express the expected ages.
The reason I suggested the check was to eliminate images that are not
in the current config. I figured a test for relative file age could
be done in the for loop -- possibly replace shell wildcard with
find arch/$(ARCH)/boot/{zImage*,dtbImage*,uImage*,cuImage*,treeboot*}
-newer vmlinux -print.
> (but would you like me to add treeboot and cuboot?)
I don't see why we should prefer the workstations and servers over the
embedded boards. zImage is just a link to the first boot image, but
one can build a multiple formats and the order is somewhat arbitrary.
So I see it as fairness. Otherwise, there are a few other platforms
that are "user" based vs embedded (like efkia, no?).
milton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists