[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15114.1217045033@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:03:53 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marcel Selhorst <tpm@...horst.net>,
Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@...ibm.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.26-mmotm tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion-d820-fix.patch
Patch tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion reveals a bug in the
Broadcom BCM0102 TPM chipset used in the Dell Latitude D820 - although most of
the timeouts are returned in usecs as per the spec, one is apparently returned
in msecs, which results in a timeout when the code treats it as usecs. To
prevent a regression, we check for the known too-short value and adjust it to a
value that makes things work.
Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
cc: Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
--- linux-2.6.26-mmotm-0724/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c.broadcom 2008-07-25 22:13:47.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.26-mmotm-0724/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c 2008-07-25 23:30:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -557,6 +557,13 @@ duration:
usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
(*((__be32 *) (data +
TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_1_IDX))));
+ /* The Broadcom BCM0102 chipset in a Dell Latitude D820 gets the above
+ * value wrong and apparently reports msecs rather than usecs. Test
+ * for the specific buggy value and adjust it to prevent a regression.
+ */
+ if (chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] == 1)
+ chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] *= 1000;
+
chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
(*((__be32 *) (data +
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists