[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080729112724.GA11276@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:27:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
joerg.roedel@....com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bhavna.sarathy@....com, robert.richter@....com,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add iommu_num_pages helper function
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:41:56 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > ok, i'll apply the 3 patches to tip/x86/iommu. As usual, feel free to
> > send IOMMU cleanups/generalizations/fixes against tip/master:
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>
> So, I assume a patch created on July 25 is not destined for 2.6.27,
> right? Especially since it breaks another architecture build and has
> only made it to linux-next on July 29 ... and needs more work given
> the comments already on this patch.
Correct, they were not intended for immediate upstream merging, they
werent even in auto-x86-next so there was no meaningful linux-next
exposure.
I was surprised they went upstream via the PCI tree yesterday, just
hours after i sent them over to Jesse and about an hour before -rc1 was
released. [ Nor did intend the core/generic-dma-coherent bits to go
upstream right before -rc1 - although those seem to be problem-free so
far. ]
I stopped sending non-urgent patches to Linus days ago, to let things
calm down for a smooth -rc1 release.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists