linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080729202731.F18F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:28:24 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure

> 
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:00:55 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ *get_cpu_mask(cpu); })
> > > > +#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) (*get_cpu_mask(cpu))
> > > 
> > > hm, i'm wondering - is this a compiler bug?
> > 
> > Or maybe a deficiency in such an old compiler (v3.4.5) but the fix 
> > makes sense anyway, right?
> 
> yeah, i was just wondering.

in linux/README

COMPILING the kernel:

 - Make sure you have at least gcc 3.2 available.
   For more information, refer to Documentation/Changes.



So, if 3.4.5 is old, Should we change readme?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/