linux-kernel - Re: Comments on UV tlb flushing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <488F2C9B.9070306@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:43:39 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
CC:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, steiner@....com,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Comments on UV tlb flushing

Cliff Wickman wrote:
> I think that the Linux distributions are not going to build a special
> UV kernel, are they?  So every distro would have to be prompted to 
> turn on CONFIG_X86_UV, or else their kernel is not going to boot on UV.
>   

Distros will generally turn on everything.  You could have it on by 
default if the kernel is built for CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH which enables 
support for other big numa configurations.  I think distros generally 
build with that enabled anyway.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/