[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080729173420.GA18296@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:34:20 -0500
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, steiner@....com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Comments on UV tlb flushing
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:43:39AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Cliff Wickman wrote:
>> I think that the Linux distributions are not going to build a special
>> UV kernel, are they? So every distro would have to be prompted to
>> turn on CONFIG_X86_UV, or else their kernel is not going to boot on UV.
>>
>
> Distros will generally turn on everything. You could have it on by
> default if the kernel is built for CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH which enables
> support for other big numa configurations. I think distros generally
> build with that enabled anyway.
>
> J
I don't know much about x86 configuration options. It looks like
CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is fairly new, so I don't know where to look
for samples of how it will be set by RH and SuSE.
But if the tlb_uv.o code should be present in "every" distro x86 kernel
I don't see the point of having to configure it in. Why not just
configure it out for small (embedded) kernels?
-Cliff
--
Cliff Wickman
Silicon Graphics, Inc.
cpw@....com
(651) 683-3824
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists