[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730084405.GD18366@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:44:05 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: petkovbb@...il.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] docsrc: build Documentation/ sources
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27:32PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > Currently source files in the Documentation/ sub-dir can easily bit-rot
> > since they are not generally buildable, either because they are hidden
> > in text files or because there are no Makefile rules for them.
> > This needs to be fixed so that the source files remain usable and good
> > examples of code instead of bad examples.
> >
> > Add the ability to build source files that are in the Documentation/ dir.
> > Add to Kconfig as "BUILD_DOCSRC" config symbol.
> >
> > Use "CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC=1 make ..." to build objects from the
> > Documentation/ sources. Or enable BUILD_DOCSRC in the *config system.
>
> How about simply adding another makefile target instead? This is more
> intuitive, imho, and complies with the Kbuild conventions so far.
> Something like:
>
> make docsrc
>
> similar to 'make help' or 'make pdfdocs' etc.
With the current approach we have much better build coverage.
All "allyesconfig" and "allmodconfig" builds will do the test
builds which is a good think.
If we introduce "make docsrc" then almost only Randy will do the
test builds and report the breakage - which is not good.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists