linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] docsrc: build Documentation/ sources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080730112136.GA19465@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:21:36 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	petkovbb@...il.com
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] docsrc: build Documentation/ sources

> >
> > With the current approach we have much better build coverage.
> > All "allyesconfig" and "allmodconfig" builds will do the test
> > builds which is a good think.
> > If we introduce "make docsrc" then almost only Randy will do the
> > test builds and report the breakage - which is not good.
> 
> Well, i don't see anymore people than Randy doing
> 
> CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC=1 make ...

One such example is:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next

Here the all*config will do the build test of the
documentation and Stephen will tell if it breaks.

> either so only the other option remains, which means CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC
> should be "default y" for more coverage...
No - we do not want to set config options to "default y" unless
there are _very_ good reasons to do so.

You should check a few of Linus' responses during
this merge window if you want more background on this.
	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/