lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:24:36 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Roberto Oppedisano <roppedisano@...racomspa.it>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-00000-g8be1a6d - WARNING: at drivers/base/power/main.c:82

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:33:21 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <roppedisano@...racomspa.it> wrote:
> 
> > More info on request.
> > 
> 
> Let's cc linux-usb, as that appears to be the subsystem which triggered
> this:
> 
> int device_pm_add(struct device *dev)
> {
> 	int error;
> 
> 	pr_debug("PM: Adding info for %s:%s\n",
> 		 dev->bus ? dev->bus->name : "No Bus",
> 		 kobject_name(&dev->kobj));
> 	mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> 	if (dev->parent) {
> 		if (dev->parent->power.status >= DPM_SUSPENDING) {
> 			dev_warn(dev, "parent %s is sleeping, will not add\n",
> 				dev->parent->bus_id);
> 			WARN_ON(true);
> 		}
> 
> WARN_ON.
> 
> Also, I assume that your kernel did print that "parent %s is sleeping"
> message, but you trimmed it off.  That would probably be useful
> information.

Hmmm...  I don't suppose anyone ever thought to indicate which kernel 
version produced this warning?

If you look at the offending source code in 2.6.27-rc1, you'll find a
comment that explains the whole thing.  From do_unbind_rebind() --
admittedly not easy to single out from the rather lengthy stack trace
-- in drivers/usb/core/driver.c:

	/* FIXME: The next line is needed because we are going to probe
	 * the interface, but as far as the PM core is concerned the
	 * interface is still suspended.  The problem wouldn't exist
	 * if we could rebind the interface during the interface's own
	 * resume() call, but at the time the usb_device isn't locked!
	 *
	 * The real solution will be to carry this out during the device's
	 * complete() callback.  Until that is implemented, we have to
	 * use this hack.
	 */
//					intf->dev.power.sleeping = 0;

The last line had to be commented out because the power.sleeping field 
was removed during the transition from 2.6.26 to 2.6.27-rc1.  The code 
that will make this work properly, with no warnings, hasn't been 
written yet; I was waiting for 2.6.27-rc1 to appear so there'd be a 
more-or-less stable base to work from.

For the time being you can simply ignore the WARNING; it is harmless.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ