| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:25:45 -0500 From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig? Should this be changed for the x86 architecture? config HOTPLUG_CPU bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)" depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists