lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730142545.GA25835@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:25:45 -0500
From:	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86

I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable.  I'm assuming
that's in the context of the x86 architecture.  If so, how come
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig?
Should this be changed for the x86 architecture?

config HOTPLUG_CPU
	bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
	depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ