linux-kernel - Re: 463 kernel developers missing!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e4733910807300851y2121667fqf8547cdd27ecc6b8@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:51:11 -0400
From:	"Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@...il.com>
To:	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	davids@...master.com, "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing!

On 7/30/08, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > > The GPL doesn't trump data protection law. It can't.
>  >
>  > By making a submission to a GPL'd project didn't you grant a license
>  > for your data to be used? That was Ted's point when he posted the
>  > developer's certification.
>
>
> Data protection law trumps the GPL. The fact my address is public does
>  not give you the rights globally to process it.
>

There are a lot of companies (including Google's code database)
indexing the kernel source and processing it into new form. What is
their standing?

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/