[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730183721.GA29639@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:37:21 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mISDN cleanup user interface
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:51:38PM +0200, Karsten Keil wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:57:01PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 18:33 +0200, Karsten Keil wrote:
> > > What about this implementation ?
> >
> > Looks a lot saner... although it does seem to confirm my earlier
> > suspicion that you're not even _using_ the fact that it's a bitmap at
> > all. You set the bits for the present channels at init time, which are
> > always contiguous, and you never seem to change them them later -- why
> > couldn't you do this with a simple 'number of channels' integer?
>
> No it is not contineous on different PRI line setups (E1,T1 ...)
> e.g a E1 has the D-channel on channel 15 position, so this bit is not set
> then.
timeslot 16 in my book actually - but maybe that your timeslot to
channel mapping.
Not that it has anything to do with the topic discussed!
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists