[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4890C877.3080609@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:00:55 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing!
On 30-07-08 21:47, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:
>> So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here (which
>> I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the addresses
>> into a _way_ too public place/format.
>
> Er, what? Are you saying that a mailcap file inside a .gz or .bz2 or a
> git repository is *more* public than a mailing list?
Inside a .gz of .bz2? But yes, definitely. Have you ever noticed exactly
how many fully indexed linux source trees there are out there on the
web? And how not any mailinglist archive does _not_ take the trouble to
obscure addresses?
> or the already existing gitweb history of the main tree?
>
> I've noticed correlated (lagged) spikes in my spam volume to the
> email address I use for this list whenever I post from it, so please
> consider that you are perhaps being penny-wise and pound-foolish
> here.
I'm not talking about spam. Spammers will get anything that's not
private. As said, I'm talking about scale of publicness.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists