[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4890CDF4.3010407@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:24:20 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing!
On 30-07-08 21:41, Rene Herman wrote:
> So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here
> (which I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the
> addresses into a _way_ too public place/format. It's a matter of scale;
> as opposed to the SCM metadata, your tree itself is way too public to
> put anything in without very definite and explicit approval. I feel.
This, Jon, by the way also suggests something which I would consider
much better; _keep_ it as SCM metadata in some less-accesible format
under .git/
I doubt anyone's going to come up with an objection then. It's already
in that exact same spot after all.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists