[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e4733910807301327k4f7e9d38h2453d46b98750c05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:46 -0400
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@...il.com>
To: "Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
"Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
"Simon Arlott" <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing!
On 7/30/08, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:
> On 30-07-08 21:41, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>
> > So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here
> (which I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the
> addresses into a _way_ too public place/format. It's a matter of scale; as
> opposed to the SCM metadata, your tree itself is way too public to put
> anything in without very definite and explicit approval. I feel.
> >
>
> This, Jon, by the way also suggests something which I would consider much
> better; _keep_ it as SCM metadata in some less-accesible format under .git/
The decision to keep it in .mailmap format was made before I was
involved. A smaller .mailmap has been in the tree since 2007. Existing
tools will need to be changed if the location is moved.
>
> I doubt anyone's going to come up with an objection then. It's already in
> that exact same spot after all.
>
> Rene.
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists