[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080731160438.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: zhangxiliang <zhangxiliang@...fujitsu.com>, sgrubb@...hat.com,
Linux Audit <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the bug of using AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT when set
fail, no error output.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote:
> > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT".
> > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the failure of rate set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@...fujitsu.com>
>
> man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows
> everything else
Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists