[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080731145934.cc3893de.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:59:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: eparis@...hat.com, zhangxiliang@...fujitsu.com, sgrubb@...hat.com,
linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the bug of using AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT when set
fail, no error output.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0100
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote:
> > > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT".
> > > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the failure of rate set.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> > man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows
> > everything else
>
> Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53)
That tree doesn't appear to be in the linux-next lineup. Fixable, please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists