lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830807311009o4275c0d0k84d4a5d4eadc3f41@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:09:42 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>
Cc:	"Rakib Mullick" <rakib.mullick@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removes extra checking in kernel/cpuset.c

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> Rakib wrote:
>> Hello guys, this patch removes an extra checking over 'cs' in
>> functions 'guarantee_online_cpus' and 'guarantee_online_mems'.
>> ...
>> -     while (cs && !cpus_intersects(cs->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map))
>> -             cs = cs->parent;
>> -     if (cs)
>> +     if (cs) {
>> +             while (!cpus_intersects(cs->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map))
>> +                     cs = cs->parent;
>
> I don't think that works - "cs->parent" can be NULL, and will be NULL
> if cs is the root cpuset.

True, but if top_cpuset.cpus_allowed doesn't intersect with
cpu_online_map then maybe we have other problems?

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ