linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080801210924.GE14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:09:24 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 06:58:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10815
> > > Subject		: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP find_pid_ns+0x6b/0xa0
> > > Submitter	: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> > > Date		: 2008-05-27 09:23 (41 days old)
> > > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/9
> > > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/87
> > > Handled-By	: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
> > > 		  Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > 		  Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/28/16
> > 
> > This one is the same thing that is reported as unresolved, and no, I 
> > don't think that existing patch was ever really tested to fix 
> > anything. Paul?
> > 
> > I suspect SRCU will need to be simply marked BROKEN for now, because 
> > nobody knows what the problem Alexey sees is. Apparently it's been 
> > seen by a few other people too.
> 
> I'm not sure it's directly related to SRCU - it can change timings and 
> freeing patterns enough to tickle other bugs. Since Alexey Dobriyan has 
> reported it - are perhaps namespaces in use during this stress-test? 
> Maybe it's some namespaces related bug that is more easily reproduced 
> under SRCU - namespaces is not a commonly tested feature.

I have CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y.  Should I also set one or more of
CONFIG_UTS_NS, CONFIG_IPC_NS, CONFIG_USER_NS, or CONFIG_PID_NS?

What the heck, I will just set them all and pound away on kernbenchx170
and rcutorture.

							Thanx, Paul

> Also, i've been running rcutorture stress-tests on a number of 
> test-systems ever since this got reported (and they are running 
> currently as well) and cannot see it - neither could Paul reproduce it.
> 
> ( and Paul is very good in producing RCU related problems - he's
>   triggered and fixed many RCU related problems that no-one else saw
>   before. )
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/