[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080801210929.GF14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:09:29 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rcu classic: new algorithm for
callbacks-processing
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 05:23:47PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >
> > You tried this without your changes and it passed, correct?
> >
> > Never forget to test the base kernel. ;-)
> >
>
> Thanks, but I make some mistake here.
>
> I tested the base kernel, no bug occurred.
> So I try to find out bugs in my changes in 2 weeks.
>
> I added debug codes and these codes showed all processing
> are right and no callback broke its grace period
> but the bug still occurred.
>
> When I was puzzled after 2 weeks, I looked back the base
> kernel that I had tested, and I found that I forget to set
> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y.
>
> Then I set CONFIG_NO_HZ=y in the base kernel, and the bug
> occurred. It's exactly as the bug when my patch applied.
>
> I have reported this bug here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/3/24
Hello, Jiangshan,
Does Gautham's patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/27/9) help?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists