[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080801210913.GC14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:09:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU
issue?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:03:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> There seems to be something in trace_mark() keeping latency low:
>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.24.4/include/linux/marker.h#L52
>> I will follow your suggestions.
>
> I removed all "likely" and "unlikely" macros, but the latencies did not
> improve. Then I added
>
> preempt_disable();
> preempt_enable();
>
> at the two locations mentioned above, like trace_mark() does, and disabled
> CONFIG_RCU_TRACE. That helped to keep the latencies low, and it did for
> 2.6.25.8-rt7 as well. As I see it, adding preemption points seem to prevent
> high latencies.
Interesting. Perhaps a preempt_enable_no_resched() somewhere that
should be preempt_enable()?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists